Prepayment Penalty Must Be Disclosed
REM #C752
By Ilyce R. Glink
Summary: Here are some comments Ilyce has received on a recent column. The original question was written by a surprised homeowner that was not aware of a prepayment penalty attached to his refinanced mortgage documents.
Comment: As a Realtor, I was appalled by your "advice" to the homeowner
who had to pay a prepayment penalty on his loan because he sold the house within
the prepayment penalty.
First, you essentially called the writer a liar by saying he admitted he knew there was a prepayment penalty. He did not admit this. He clearly recognized after the fact that the prepayment penalty information was in his loan documents. It sounds to me that he didn't realize he had to pay this penalty until it showed up on his HUD-1 form when he sold his home. I have had this exact thing happen to my sellers.
Second, you infer that it was his fault for not more closely checking his loan documents. Give me a break! His lender should have clearly told him there would be a prepayment penalty if he went with this loan. No buyer should have to figure this out while signing a two-inch thick pile of documents. The lender has an obligation to clearly spell out the terms of the loan so the buyer knows what he will be signing before he signs it. The [closing] should not hold any surprises.
Finally, you should know most lenders who refinance a home that has been listed for sale in the past six months will require a prepayment penalty. So you did nothing to educate your readers about this fact either.
You really make me wonder whose side you are on with your column.
A: Thanks for your note. Let’s review that question again.
Legally, the home buyer was responsible for reading each page of the legal documents
he signed. When a prepayment penalty is attached to a loan, there are at least
2 to 4 separate disclosures that have to be signed and initialed. The buyer
admitted he knew there was a prepayment penalty. I assumed that he knew this
before the closing.
But let's say he didn't. Are you letting a home buyer off the hook when it comes
to reading and signing legal documents? I'm fairly certain that the lender (unless
it was a predatory lender) told this buyer there was a prepayment penalty. But
even if the lender didn't, there were still several pages of disclosures that
said "prepayment penalty" on them that had to be signed before the
loan could close.
My feeling is that no one should sign any legal documents unless they read them
first. Signing or initialing a legal document indicates to the world that you
have read and understand the paper you’ve signed.
Buyers can take as much time as they want at the closing and have the lender answer all of their questions right then and there. If there's something different about the documents than what was originally agreed to when they applied for the loan, the buyer should speak up.
At my own recent closing on an investment property, I caught a quarter-point
mistake in the interest rate on the loan documents. I found it by asking plenty
of questions about the numbers of the paper.
Let’s face it: A two-inch stack of legal documents is a lot to swallow
in one sitting. That's why I recommend every home buyer hire an attorney to
walk him or her through the documents page-by-page. It's worth every penny to
have their expertise.
But the bottom line is that home buyers are making a significant investment
in real property and must accept the responsibility that comes with it. If they
feel that the lender is "surprising" them with a prepayment penalty
at the closing, then they should stop the closing (this is their right) and
insist that the prepayment penalty be removed.
While this sounds hard, it really isn't. If a lender has attached a prepayment
penalty at the last minute, it can be detached as well.
As for taking sides, I don't. But I do feel that home buyers, sellers, real
estate agents and lenders need to take responsibility for their own actions
and mistakes.
One last issue, if the lender did not have the borrower sign the proper disclosures
and hid the prepayment penalty, then, of course, the buyer has the right to
hire an attorney and sue the lender for the lender’s failure to disclose
and the switch of terms at the closing.
NOTE: This column is distributed by Real Estate Matters Syndicate, PO Box 366, Glencoe, Illinois, 60022. This column may not be resold, reprinted, resyndicated or redistributed without written permission from the publisher.
Land Contract Bad Idea
Refinancing With Poor Credit Score
Interest Rates Drop Again
About the Buyer’s Market
Deciding When To Pay Off Loan
Link to This Article
Like what you've read? Spread the word! You can link to this article
from your website by copying the following code and adding it to
a page on your website:
Copyright ©2001-2007. ThinkGlink, Inc.
All rights reserved. Reproduction of material from any www.ThinkGlink.com pages without permission is strictly prohibited.
Site designed by Walker Sands Communications