Canceling A Contract When The Numbers Don't Match
Added June 18, 2009 by Ilyce R. Glink
Summary: Generally when people buy homes, they don't buy them on the basis of the number of square feet the home has. If the square footage of a home is important, the parties to that transaction need to make sure that they know and understand how the square footage of the home is computed and what happens if the numbers are wrong. Can you cancel a contract if the square footage is less than what is advertised? How difficult is it to cancel a contract? Can you get your money back?
Q: We are buying a home and are set to close in a week. The home was appraised by the mortgage lender’s appraiser and the appraisal shows the gross living area is about 4 percent less than advertised in the listing sheet. The listing sheet square footage is the same as listed on the tax assessor’s rolls.
We are thinking of asking the seller to reduce the sales price because the home is actually smaller than advertised. Is this a legitimate request? If the sellers refuse to reduce the price, can we walk away from the deal and get our earnest money back?
A: Let’s think this through for a moment: Did you buy this house because you think the square footage is supposed to be a certain amount? In other words, did you go searching for a 2,500 square foot house? Or, did you feel that the house met your needs as is?
Let me put it another way: If square footage on the appraisal had come in higher than the square footage listed on the listing sheet, would you have offered to pay more? I don’t think so.
I don't think this is a legitimate request. You're buying a house, and there are many ways to calculate the square footage of the property. You can calculate it from the outside walls, or you can measure the internal square footage of each room. Each of these ways of measuring square footage is accepted in different arenas.
It’s also possible that the appraiser made a mathematical mistake.
If you walk away from the deal, the sellers may be able to keep your down payment and, depending on the term of your contract, may be able to sue you for even more.
You should speak with a real estate attorney who can walk you through the contract you signed, explain the various ways square footage can calculated, and discuss your options with you.
You may also find that unless you specifically required the seller in your contract to deliver to you a home of at least a certain number of square feet with a method of computing that square footage, you’ll be out of luck if you want to kill the deal because of that issue.
Another reader had the same experience when buying a home and finding that the square footage was off.
See more articles on this topic by clicking on the "RELATED ARTICLES" above and to the right.
We have over 5000 articles on Real Estate Advice, Personal Finance Advice and Consumer Advice on our site. We encourage you to look at these articles. As always, if you have a comment on our articles, don't forget to post your comment below. We thank you for coming to ThinkGlink.com.
© Ilyce R. Glink. All rights reserved. This content may not be used, distributed, syndicated, compiled or excerpted in any medium or form without written authorization from Think Glink, Inc. For information on syndicating ThinkGlink.com please contact us.
Additional Topics
(View All Topics)consumer advice credit estate planning home buying ilyce glink mortgage mortgage lenders mortgage loan personal finance advice real estate real estate advice real estate agent refinance mortgage selling taxes









Comments
Julie says
I'm an exclusive buyer's agent in Charlotte, NC, and I think you're missing the point of the complaint from the buyers who were under contract to purchase a home that the appraiser had measured as 4% smaller than the listing agent had advertised in the listing sheet. The point was not that the home was only 4% smaller; the point was that the listing agent did not verify the square footage of the home by measuring it herself or paying a professional to measure the property before she listed it for sale. Instead she used an outdated sq.ft. figure that she found in the tax records, and represented that as the current sq. ft figure. Tax records are notorious for being grossly inaccurate. At a minimum, the listing agent's J-O-B is to measure their seller-clients home or pay an appraiser to measure it before they list it for sale, so they can estimate the new value including any improvements/changes the seller has made to their home since they bought it, and advise their seller-client as to a competitive asking price. Real estate agents know that buyers make their purchase decisions based almost entirely on emotion, but listing agents must still treat buyers and buyer's agents fairly, and that includes verifying the size of the property they are advertising for sale on behalf of their seller-client. The sq. ft. of a property cannot be easily ascertained by consumers, their real estate agents, or even appraisers, yet it is often the biggest value adjustment an appraiser makes in a tract-built neighborhood of homes with similar styles and features. Real estate professionals must be able to trust that their peers will deliver the legally required level of service that consumers expect from them, and in NC that includes measuring the size of the seller-client's home before listing it for sale. Using tax records as the sole source of sq. ft. information on a property listed for sale is prohibited and against NC real estate license law. Tolerating sloppy practices from listing agents who use tax information for sq. ft. instead of measuring the properties they are listing for sale has contributed to the market plummet of property values in the past 3-5 years. And the buyers then are the sellers now who are paying the price again, with banks and appraisers facing stricter lending requirements as a result of the foreclosure crisis crippling our economy today.
Ilyce says
I appreciate the comment. And, I agree that there are many different ways of measuring square footage. The way an appraiser might do it is different from the builder's architect. We don't know how the tax assessor measured it. However, if she liked the home at 1,000 square fet and felt that she had paid a fair price for it, why did she suddenly feel as thought she was getting ripped off if it was 960 square feet. Would she have felt like she had a bargain at 1040 square feet? The point is that she walked through the space and liked it. She felt comfortable there. And, more importantly, it's unlikely that her contract permitted her another bite at the apple because she now thinks the place is smaller than she thought the day before. And, is it? Is her appraiser's measurement any more accurate? Again, we don't know. IT's possible the appraiser measured inside walls (very common) rather than exterior walls, which a tax assessor will commonly do. Is one more correct than the other? I don't think so. It's just another example of the confusion that reigns in the world of real estate. Again, thanks for taking the time to write.
Julie says
I know there are many different ways of measuring square footage depending on the method appraisers typically use in any given area. But that listing agent did not measure her seller-client's home at all! Don't you think that measuring sellers' homes in order to determine the new value is a minimal level service that consumers should be able to expect from the listing agent they hire? And like you mentioned, what if the seller's home was actually larger that what the tax records said? How can listing agents be the fiduciary of their sellers if they use the square footage measurements in outdated tax records to estimate value instead of verifying the measurements themselves? Nobody wants to unknowingly pay more than a home is worth even if they like the home very much. If they knowingly pay more than a home is worth, then at least they are making an informed decision! And I think appraisers would agree that the biggest variable in determining value is the size of a home, regardless of how it's measured. Each state Realtor's Association publishes guidelines for real estate professionals to use when reporting square footage as required by that state's real estate license law. Here's the NC Guidelines: http://www.ncrec.state.nc.us/publications-bulletins/sqft.html And here's a Boston Globe article about the problem of square footage inflation in the Boston market: http://www.boston.com/realestate/news/blogs/renow/2008/05/square_footage.html Real estate agents still have a long way to go with regards to raising their estimation in the eyes of consumers. And making sure they verify the size of a home they are advertising for sale would go a long ways toward accomplishing that goal.
Ilyce says
The point that real estate agents can provide more and better information and better customer service is a good one. But remember, it's buyer beware. The buyer and her agent could have also asked for a new measurement, done it themselves or hired an appraiser. It's a little late in the game to say, "We want a price reduction."