The New York Times discussed the new (www.nytimes.com/2007/08/19/washington/19hospital.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin) Medicare policy directive being published next week. It basically says that Medicare won't pay for hospital errors.
So, if a hospital causes you to have an infection, bed sores or a pressure ulcer, Medicare won't pay for the treatment. The government believes this will save tens of millions of dollars a year. In Michigan, where the focus has been on limiting new infections in hospitals, the program has saved nearly $250 million in the last year or so.
If you can save that kind of money, you can bet that private insurers will be all over this.
Is this a good idea? On the show this morning, Earl (my first caller) felt that this would only cause prices to rise. While hospitals would be prohibited from charging the patients if Medicare wouldn't pay, Earl pointed out that they would raise the prices on everything else.
Perhaps, but then you could shop around based on infection rates for example.
What do you think?
Aug. 19, 2007.
See more articles on this topic by clicking on the "RELATED ARTICLES" above and to the right.
We have over 5000 articles on Real Estate Advice, Personal Finance Advice and Consumer Advice on our site. We encourage you to look at these articles. As always, if you have a comment on our articles, don't forget to post your comment below. We thank you for coming to ThinkGlink.com.
© Ilyce R. Glink. All rights reserved. This content may not be used, distributed, syndicated, compiled or excerpted in any medium or form without written authorization from Think Glink, Inc. For information on syndicating ThinkGlink.com please contact us.
Additional Topics
(View All Topics)consumer advice credit estate planning home buying ilyce glink mortgage mortgage lenders mortgage loan personal finance advice real estate real estate advice real estate agent refinance mortgage selling taxes









Comments
No comments have been posted.