Blog: Class Action Lawsuit Against The Reserve Primary Fund

Added September 22, 2008 by Ilyce Glink

The Reserve Primary Fund Ticker Symbol: RPRXX Market: NASDAQ Class Period: 9/16/2008 - 9/16/2008 Court: S.D. New York Date of filing: 9/17/2008 Plaintiff Firm: Wolf Popper, LLP SIC Code: Sector Classification: Financial Industry Classification: Other (Mutual Fund)

Summary: According to a press release dated September 19, 2008, a class action was filed against the financial adviser, the underwriter, and the trustees of the Reserve Fund ("Reserve Fund" or the "Trust"). The action was brought on behalf of investors who owned shares in any class of the Primary Fund (or the "Fund"), a series of the Reserve Fund, who had not requested redemption of their shares by 3 p.m. E.S.T. on Tuesday, September 16, 2008.The Reserve Fund is an investment trust organized under Massachusetts law, headquartered in New York City. The Trust consists of Mutual Funds, of which the Primary Fund is a series.

The Primary Fund is a money market mutual fund that is required, by law, to invest in only the highest quality securities and debt obligations.

The complaint alleges that in violation of its legal obligations, as imposed by the Investment Company Act and the SEC's Rule 2A-7 thereunder, the Primary Fund had invested in, and continued to invest in, approximately $785 million in commercial paper and other debt obligations issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. ("Lehman") (Pink Sheets:LEHMQ).

As Lehman's financial difficulties mounted in recent months, its debt obligations became high-risk securities that were inappropriate for money market funds to hold. The Complaint further alleges that by Friday, September 12, 2008, Lehman's financial situation had become desperate; yet defendants continued to hold the debt obligations. On September 15, 2008, when Lehman filed for bankruptcy, defendants were still holding onto $785 million of the Company's debt obligations, which were now worthless. By the afternoon of September 16, defendants had allowed about a dozen institutional investors to withdraw a total of over $40 billion from the fund, at the "net asset value" price of $1.00 per share. That is the per share value that the Reserve Fund, like virtually all money market funds, strives to maintain.

However, the shares were actually worth less than that when they were redeemed. It was not until the markets closed on September 16 that defendants issued a press release announcing that the net asset value of the fund had belatedly been reduced to 97 cents per share, a shocking and extremely rare development known in the industry as "breaking the buck."

The press release announced that investors who had sought redemption up to 3 P.M. that day would receive $1 per share, but that subsequent requests for redemption would be at the 97 cents price, and that payments for those shares would be withheld for up to 7 days.

As spelled out in the complaint, defendants violated Section 8 of the Investment Act of 1940 by deviating from the Fund's fundamental investment objectives without approval by the shareholders of the Fund and by allowing massive redemptions by a favored few investors at an inflated price of $1.00 per share. These actions gave an unfair advantage to certain fund investors at the expense of others, and in a manner which violated the Fund's stated procedure as well as defendants' fiduciary obligations to investors.

Sept. 22, 2008

See more articles on this topic by clicking on the "RELATED ARTICLES" above and to the right.

We have over 5000 articles on Real Estate Advice, Personal Finance Advice and Consumer Advice on our site. We encourage you to look at these articles. As always, if you have a comment on our articles, don't forget to post your comment below. We thank you for coming to ThinkGlink.com.

© Ilyce R. Glink. All rights reserved. This content may not be used, distributed, syndicated, compiled or excerpted in any medium or form without written authorization from Think Glink, Inc. For information on syndicating ThinkGlink.com please contact us.

Rate this article

  • Average rating of 5 from 1 reader

Comments

NC says

April 6, 2009 at 01:27 pm

PLEASE POST GUIDANCE AS TO TAX REPORTING OF THIS LIQUIDATION PROCEEDS. THANKS

Post Comment

*Required Field



Signup for our newsletter

Visit The Blog

Latest blog posted on 11/05/2009

Jobs, Foreclosures, The Stock ...